Clear and precise explanation of the results with refer

Question

Clear and precise explanation of the results with reference to relevant statistical components

Ram Kumar · Accepted Answer

10.3% of patients on the AVNT performed below the cutoff, but no deficient performances were seen among HCs. On the AVNT, ALS patients fared worse than HCs  (t(22.61) = - 2.48; p = 0.026; d = - 0.61). It was shown that there was no connection between AVNT scores and disease-related characteristics was detected. At 𝝰 adjusted = 0.006, the AVNT was strongly related (ps < 0.001) to ECAS total (rs(29)=0.75), ALS-specific (rs(29)=0.71), language (rs(29)=0.68), and Executive (rs(29)=0.65) scores. In terms of differentiating between CN and ALSci/cbi patients, the AVNT produced outstanding accuracy (AUC=14 0.89; SE=14 0.06; 95% CI [0.77, 1]). Particularly, with such a cutoff, 58.6% of patients were discovered to have subpar AVNT performance. nts (AUC = 0.89; SE = 0.06; 95% CI [0.77, 1]). At the best cutoff discriminating CN vs. ALSci/cbi patients ( sensitivity = 1; specificity = 0.84), optimal post-test features were detected: PPV =0.5; NPV = 1; LR+ =3.83; LR- =0.  Particularly, with such a cutoff, 58.6% of patients were discovered to have subpar AVNT performance. Additionally, by comparing the AVNT to below-cutoff scores on the ECAS total, Language, and Fluency scales, moderate-to-high diagnostic accuracy was found. Regardless of the clinical profile, the results demonstrate that word naming is a reliable test to identify domain-specific cognitive impairments in ALS patients (Aiello, Edoardo Nicolò et al.,2022 p.3).

Clear and precise explanation of the results with reference to relevant statistical components

Get Instant Homework HelpOn Your Mobile

Get Instant Homework HelpOn Your Mobile